The Department of Transportation's mission is to ensure fast, safe, efficient, accessible and convenient transportation that meets vital national interests and enhances the quality of life of the American people, today and into the future.
|Recipient||Amount||Start Date||End Date|
|Middletown & New Jersey Railroad Llc||$ 1,200,000||   ||2020-09-01||2029-12-31|
|Brightline Trains Florida Llc||$ 16,350,000||   ||2021-09-27||2028-09-26|
|Iowa Northern Railway Company||$ 5,425,464||   ||2021-07-01||2027-07-31|
|Lake State Railway Company||$ 7,875,770||   ||2020-12-01||2026-03-31|
|Transportation, Wisconsin Department Of||$ 31,800,000||   ||2022-02-01||2025-12-31|
|Sierra Northern Railway||$ 17,415,000||   ||2020-04-01||2025-12-31|
|Southern California Regional Rail Authority||$ 10,746,091||   ||2021-10-01||2025-10-31|
|Delmarva Central Railroad Company||$ 18,803,354||   ||2020-12-01||2025-09-30|
|New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Company||$ 8,262,391||   ||2021-12-01||2025-06-30|
|New Hampshire Northcoast Corp||$ 4,562,905||   ||2021-07-19||2025-03-31|
Uses and Use Restrictions
(1) Deployment of railroad safety technology, including positive train control and rail integrity inspection systems.
(2) A capital project as defined in section 24401(2), except that a project shall not be required to be in a State rail
plan developed under chapter 227.
(3) A capital project identified by the Secretary as being necessary to address congestion challenges affecting rail service.
(4) A capital project identified by the Secretary as being necessary to reduce congestion and facilitate ridership growth
in intercity passenger rail transportation along heavily traveled rail corridors.
(5) A highway-rail grade crossing improvement project, including installation, repair, or improvement of grade separations,
railroad crossing signals, gates, and related technologies, highway traffic signalization, highway lighting and crossing approach signage, roadway improvements such as medians or other barriers, railroad crossing panels and surfaces, and safety engineering improvements to reduce risk in quiet zones or potential quiet zones.
(6) A rail line relocation and improvement project.
(7) A capital project to improve short-line or regional railroad infrastructure.
(8) The preparation of regional rail and corridor service development plans and corresponding environmental analyses.
(9) Any project that the Secretary considers necessary to enhance multimodal connections or facilitate service integration
between rail service and other modes, including between intercity rail passenger transportation and intercity bus service
or commercial air service.
(10) The development and implementation of a safety program or institute designed to improve rail safety.
~80% discretionary funds (where 25% of these funds are allocated to rural areas) in FY 17 FY 17 Restrictions: $10 M of funds allocated to capital projects for initiation/restoration of service ~3% of funds allocated to Alaska, Hawaii, South Dakota, and Wyoming based on those states? rail route miles as a percentage of the nation?s total rail route miles 1% takedown.
(1) A State. (2) A group of States. (3) An Interstate Compact. (4) A public agency or publicly chartered authority established by 1 or more States. (5) A political subdivision of a State. (6) Amtrak or another rail carrier that provides intercity rail passenger transportation (7) A Class II railroad or Class III railroad (8) Any rail carrier or rail equipment manufacturer in partnership with at least 1 of the entities in (1) through (5). (9) The Transportation Research Board and any entity with which it contracts in the development of rail-related research, including cooperative research programs. (10) A University transportation center engaged in rail-related research. (11) A non-profit labor organization representing a class or craft of employees of rail carriers or rail carrier contractors.
(1) A State. (2) A group of States. (3) An Interstate Compact. (4) A public agency or publicly chartered authority established by 1 or more States. (5) A political subdivision of a State. (6) Amtrak or another rail carrier that provides intercity rail passenger transportation (7) A Class II railroad or Class III railroad (8) Any rail carrier or rail equipment manufacturer in partnership with at least 1 of the entities in (1) through (5). (9) The Transportation Research Board and any entity with which it contracts in the development of rail-related research, including cooperative research programs. (10) A University transportation center engaged in rail-related research.
SF424 (Application for Federal Assistance); SF 424A - Budget Information for Non-Construction or SF 424C Budget Information for Construction; SF 424B ? Assurances for Non-Construction or SF 424D ? Assurances for Construction; FRA?s Additional Assurances and Certifications; and SF LLL: Disclosure of Lobbying Activities. Other documents may be required as pre-requisites to funding based on program type; documentation demonstrating applicant eligibility (for applicants other than States); National Environmental Policy Act documentation for construction projects and service development programs; program-specific Assurances and Certifications; planning and engineering documentation. 2 CFR 200, Subpart E - Cost Principles applies to this program.
Aplication and Award Process
Preapplication coordination is not applicable.
Environmental impact information is not required for this program.
This program is excluded from coverage under E.O.
2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards applies to this program. An initial review of the applicant, project application and eligibility. The application is then reviewed and rated against the key criteria set forth in the NOFO.
Review the application package to ensure that all required documents are complete and signed by the appropriate person. Review the statement of work (SOW) and budget to ensure the appropriation language requirements are met. Review SOW for technical issues and budget for appropriate costs, including compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act and related laws and orders. Compare applications to determine relative satisfaction of published selection criteria. Select the applicants that are most qualified. After the application package is acceptable to both parties, a grant agreement is drafted, reviewed, and signed upon agreement by both parties.
Contact the headquarters or regional office, as appropriate, for application deadlines.
Fixing America?s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) , Public Law 114-94.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time
FRA is committed to responding to applicants in a reasonable and timely manner. Response times will vary based on size, scope, complexity and volume of applications.
Formula and Matching Requirements
Statutory Formula: Public Law 114-94. The Federal share of total project costs under this section shall not exceed 80 percent. Matching Requirements: Percent: 20%. The Federal share of total project costs under this section shall not exceed 80 percent. This program does not have MOE requirements.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance
No restriction on period of time the assistance normally is available. See the following for information on how assistance is awarded/released: Assistance is awarded upon request for reimbursement Funding is obligated through cooperative agreements, and outlays occur as reimbursement. Funding will only be obligated and disbursed as milestones are achieved.
Post Assistance Requirements
The grantee shall submit the following reports: Quarterly progress reports giving an account of significant progress (findings, events, trends, etc.) made during the reporting period, and a description of any technical and/or cost problems encountered or anticipated that will affect completion of the grant and; Final report giving details of the results and benefits of the Grantee's improvement efforts.
SF-270 Request for Advance or Reimbursement.
Quarterly progress reports.
Quarterly financial status reports using SF-425 Federal Financial Report.
Grant recipients will be monitored periodically by FRA to ensure that the project goals, objectives, performance requirements, timelines, milestones, budgets, and other related program criteria are being met.
Monitoring may include onsite visits or detailed, interactive desk reviews.
In addition, grantees are provided with intensive technical assistance from grants staff on a daily basis.
In accordance with the provisions of 2 CFR 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements, non-Federal entities that expend financial assistance of $750,000 or more in Federal awards will have a single or a program-specific audit conducted for that year. Non-Federal entities that expend less than $750,000 a year in Federal awards are exempt from Federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in 2 CFR 200.503.
During the course of its activities under a grant agreement and for three years thereafter, the applicant must agree to retain intact and to provide any data, documents, reports, records, contracts, and supporting materials relating to its performance under the agreement as FRA may require. Reporting and record-keeping requirements are set forth in 2 C.F.R. Part 200 for private non-profit and for-profit Grantees. Closeout does not alter these requirements.
(Project Grants) FY 16 $0; FY 17 est $0; and FY 18 est $92,070,000
Range and Average of Financial Assistance
Not available ? new program.
Regulations, Guidelines, and Literature
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and related laws.
Regional or Local Office
Mary Ann McNamara 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E., Washington, District of Columbia 20590 Phone: (202) 493-6393
Criteria for Selecting Proposals
FRA will give preference to a proposed project for which the proposed Federal share of total project costs does not exceed 50 percent; and select projects that will maximize the net benefits of the funds appropriated for use. Other considerations include: the degree to which the proposed project?s business plan considers potential private sector participation in the financing, construction, or operation of the project.; the recipient?s past performance in developing and delivering similar projects, and previous financial contributions; whether the recipient has or will have the legal, financial, and technical capacity to carry out the proposed project, satisfactory continuing control over the use of the equipment or facilities, and the capability and willingness to maintain the equipment or facilities; if applicable, the consistency of the proposed project with planning guidance and documents set forth by the Secretary or required by law or State rail plans developed under chapter 227; if applicable, any technical evaluation ratings the proposed project received under previous competitive grant programs administered by the Secretary; and other factors as the Secretary considers relevant to the successful delivery of the project.
Many people, organizations and businesses in Miami are actively committed to philanthropy. As Javier Alberto Soto, president and CEO of the Miami Foundation, puts it, “Miami is home to a young, diverse demographic that’s looking for ways to get involved, ways to improve our community that aren’t traditional, like a formal gala.”