Puget Sound Protection and Restoration: Tribal Implementation Assistance Program

Puget Sound has been designated as one of 28 estuaries of National Significance under §320 of the Clean Water Act.

The goal of the National Estuary Program is to attain and maintain water quality in designated estuaries that would assure protection of public water supplies and the protection and
propagation of a balanced, indigenous population of shellfish, fish and wildlife and allows recreational activities in and on the water.

The Puget Sound National Estuary Program's approved Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP) is the Action Agenda.

The goal of the Action Agenda is to restore and maintain the Puget Sound estuarine environment by 2020 so that it will support balanced indigenous populations of shellfish, fish and wildlife and support the extensive list of recognized uses of Puget Sound.


The EPA is committed to protecting and improving water quality and minimizing the adverse impacts of rapid development in the Puget Sound Basin.

These commitments include protecting the watersheds and waters of Puget Sound by protecting the fundamental watershed processes that provide and create aquatic habitats and by reducing the generation and release of toxic, nutrient and pathogen pollution.


The Puget Sound Protection and Restoration: Tribal Implementation Assistance Program is aimed at assisting the Indian Tribes of the greater Puget Sound basin in their efforts to carry out work critically needed for Puget Sound protection and restoration.

This work includes activities identified in, or consistent with, the Action Agenda such as efforts called for by established salmon recovery plans in the Puget Sound basin.

EPA has a trust responsibility to Federally recognized Indian Tribes.

EPA also recognizes that Federally recognized Indian Tribes in the greater Puget Sound basin have a critical role in the protection and restoration of the ecosystem and its resources.

EPA seeks to provide financial assistance to these Tribes to help them implement priority strategies and actions in or consistent with the approved Clean Water Act §320 CCMP for Puget Sound.




Funding Priority - Fiscal Year 2017: Tribal Implementation Lead (competitive)

Tribal Capacity (non-competitive) Capacity grants will be continued with incremental FFY2017 funding to support each Tribe and Consortium to participate in the Puget Sound Management Conference.

Eligible tasks include representing tribal interests in Management Conference forums and processes and other activities like identifying limiting factors to habitat protection and salmon and shellfish recovery.

Tribal Implementation Lead (competitive) This grant will be continued with incremental FFY2017 funding to support eligible subaward work which includes watershed and marine/estuary habitat restoration projects.

We anticipate that many of these projects will directly address salmon and shellfish recovery.Depending on funding, this grant will be continuing with incremental FFY2017 funding to support eligible subaward work which includes watershed and marine/estuary habitat restoration projects.

We anticipate that many of these projects will directly address salmon and shellfish recovery.




Funding Priorities for 2018

Depending on funding, capacity grants will continue with incremental FFY2018 funding to support each Tribe and Consortium to participate in the Puget Sound Management Conference.

Eligible tasks include representing tribal interests in Management Conference forums and processes and other activities like identifying limiting factors to habitat protection and salmon and shellfish recovery.

Also the Tribal Implementation Lead grant will be continued with incremental FFY2018 funds, depending on appropriations.
Related Programs

Examples of Funded Projects

Fiscal Year 2016: Accomplishments in FFY2016: Example Tribal Capacity award accomplishments during FY 2016: ?Completed aerial and historic map review as part of a channel re-alignment and fish passage feasibility and alternatives analysis of upper Boise Creek (RM 4.3 to 4.6).

This task supports development of the conceptual design of this habitat restoration project to restore access by anadromous salmon including ESA-listed fish of approximately 6,000 lineal feet of stream corridor in prime salmon-bearing tributary of the White River within tribe's Usual and Accustomed fishing area.

Increase in ESA-listed fish production would be an estimated 40 chinook, 15 steelhead redds and 100 coho redds.

(Puyallup Tribe). ?Continue to actively participate in regional and local Puget Sound Management Conference processes and forums, including the Hood Canal Coordinating Council (HCCC), the Straits Ecosystem Recovery Network (ERN), and the Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference, to discuss issues of concern for the tribe.

This includes assisting in developing strategies for protecting and restoring habitats and species in Hood Canal, Admiralty Inlet and the Strait of Juan de Fuca (Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe). Example Lead Organization award accomplishments during FY 2016: ?Completed extended sampling of nutrient sources and harmful algal blooms (HABs) for the Sequim Bay watershed (sampling extended into FY16 due to extended algae blooms), and initiated statistical analysis of sampling results (subaward to Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe) ?Continuing to lead coordination and integration of data and analyses for Skagit Watershed Salmon Recovery Plan, including working with subgroups on modeling and GIS analysis (subaward to Skagit River System Cooperative).

Fiscal Year 2017: No projects to report with this year funding since the incremental funding will be awarded in late FFY2017.

Fiscal Year 2018: No Current Data Available


Agency - Environmental Protection Agency

The mission of the Environmental Protection Agency is to protect human health and the environment. Since 1970, EPA has been working for a cleaner, healthier environment for the American people.

Office - See Regional Agency Offices.

Angela Adams, Team Lead Office of Water and Watersheds U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, OWW-193 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 553-0332 or 1-800-424-4EPA, extension 3-0332 E-Mail: adams.angela@epa.gov Angela Bonifaci, Team Leader Puget Sound Team Office of Ecosystems, Tribal and Public Affairs U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, ETPA-086 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 553-0332 or 1-800-424-4EPA, extension 3-0332 E-Mail: bonifaci.angela@epa.gov.



Program Accomplishments

Fiscal Year 2016: Accomplishments in FFY2016: Example Tribal Capacity award accomplishments during FY 2016: ?Completed aerial and historic map review as part of a channel re-alignment and fish passage feasibility and alternatives analysis of upper Boise Creek (RM 4.3 to 4.6). This task supports development of the conceptual design of this habitat restoration project to restore access by anadromous salmon including ESA-listed fish of approximately 6,000 lineal feet of stream corridor in prime salmon-bearing tributary of the White River within tribe's Usual and Accustomed fishing area. Increase in ESA-listed fish production would be an estimated 40 chinook, 15 steelhead redds and 100 coho redds. (Puyallup Tribe). ?Continue to actively participate in regional and local Puget Sound Management Conference processes and forums, including the Hood Canal Coordinating Council (HCCC), the Straits Ecosystem Recovery Network (ERN), and the Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference, to discuss issues of concern for the tribe. This includes assisting in developing strategies for protecting and restoring habitats and species in Hood Canal, Admiralty Inlet and the Strait of Juan de Fuca (Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe). Example Lead Organization award accomplishments during FY 2016: ?Completed extended sampling of nutrient sources and harmful algal blooms (HABs) for the Sequim Bay watershed (sampling extended into FY16 due to extended algae blooms), and initiated statistical analysis of sampling results (subaward to Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe) ?Continuing to lead coordination and integration of data and analyses for Skagit Watershed Salmon Recovery Plan, including working with subgroups on modeling and GIS analysis (subaward to Skagit River System Cooperative). Fiscal Year 2017: Tribal Implementation Lead: Projects under the tribal implementation lead vary broadly but many include restoration, long-term planning for areas of work, conducting ecological research, and tribal engagement. To further support Puget Sound recovery, Stillaguamish Tribe implemented a program to monitor water quality related to shellfish, salmon, and human health with the operation and maintenance of a remote marine hydro lab and harmful algal bloom surveys. In addition, the Tribe enhanced riparian forests on tribally-owned and private land at sites throughout the Stillaguamish basin and created an education-outreach program to educate local residents and youth on the life history and habitat requirements of salmon and watershed health. Other projects funded - *Dungeness River Floodplain Protection and Recovery (a portion to be conducted jointly with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers); *Elk Flats Phase 2 Sediment Reduction and Habitat Restoration Project; *Nooksack River Instream and Floodplain Restoration; *San Juan Island Creosote Removal (in partnership with Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Washington Conservation Corps, Veterans? Corps, and Earth Corps); *Stillaguamish River Floodplain Riparian Restoration; *Swinomish ? Coast Salish Canoe Journey Water Quality Project; *Lower Elwha ? ongoing monitoring and revegetation post-dam-removal; *Sauk Suiattle sediment research/invasive knotweed removal; **Additional information on projects can be found at the following website link - http://blogs.nwifc.org/psp/files/ **Some highlights from Tribal Capacity grants - *Swinomish - A number of efforts are underway revealing the momentum generated through the leveraged efforts of Skagit Climate Science Consortium (SC2). This includes the visualization of jointly produced hydrologic data by Seattle City Light, a historic trend visualization completed which also represents a long-time priority for SC2, interest by the Town of La Conner in using climate science to inform their upcoming Comprehensive Plan update, advancement of a joint representation of the various dynamics at play in the Skagit Delta, interest in pursuing a better understanding of how hydrologic understanding can be applied to culvert sizing, and interest by the Upper Skagit Tribe in also contributing to an expanded understanding of basin hydrology related to climate impacts. Also, the Economic Development Association of Skagit County has expressed interest in potentially partnering with SC2 to further expand local understanding of climate impacts to long-term local economic viability. *Jamestown S?Klallam - The Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration: trestle phase is completed restoring more than 20 acres of floodplain and channel migration zone. The purchase of three acres of Dungeness River for restoration at approximately river mile 9.5 has also been completed. *Both the Samish and Snoqualmie Tribes have performed knotweed removal/eradication and native planting projects. These projects had strong and critical community and landowner outreach components. *The elements pertaining to the Nisqually River Council were performed through a sub-award to the Nisqually River Foundation. The Council is a key partner in the watershed and its actions and projects are critical to our success in salmon recovery and implementing the action agenda at the local level. In particular, the elements of teacher and student involvement in the Nisqually River Education Program are vital to the long term sustainability of our environmental work. This grant has allowed an expansion of the program to additional classrooms to reach more students across the watershed with the message of stewardship and sustainability. Since the inception of the Education Program in 1992 more than 400 teachers and 9,000 students have been involved. Fiscal Year 2018: No Current Data Available

Uses and Use Restrictions

This assistance may be used by Tribes to plan for and implement work that is critically needed for Puget Sound restoration and protection.

Such work includes priority actions or strategies in or consistent with the approved §320 CCMP for Puget Sound including, but not limited to, projects called for by established salmon recovery plans, except where the proposed work is inconsistent with applicable Federal law, regulation or published EPA policy.

Additional information on use restrictions, if any, for the Puget Sound Protection and Restoration: Tribal Implementation Assistance Program, will be provided in each request for proposals published on the EPA Region 10 website. Assistance agreement awards under this program may involve or relate to geospatial information.

Further information regarding geospatial information may be obtained by viewing the following website: https://www.epa.gov/geospatial. Grant recipients and sub-recipients are encouraged to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving company-owned or -rented vehicles or government-owned vehicles, or while driving privately-owned vehicles when on official government business or when performing any work for or on behalf of the government.

Grant recipients and sub-recipients are encouraged to conduct initiatives of the type described in section 3(a) of the Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving Executive Order that was signed on October 1, 2009.

Generally this program makes Federal awards on a discretionary basis.

For further information, please contact the Headquarters or regional office.

Eligibility Requirements

Applicant Eligibility

All federally recognized Indian Tribes located within the greater Puget Sound basin, and any consortium of these eligible Tribes, may apply for funding under the program.

The greater Puget Sound basin is defined as all watersheds draining to the U.S.

waters of Puget Sound, southern Georgia Basin, and the Strait of Juan de Fuca.

An eligible Intertribal consortium is one that demonstrates that: 1) a majority of its members meet the eligibility requirements for this program; 2) all members that meet the eligibility requirements authorize the consortium to apply for and receive the grant; and 3) only members that meet the eligibility requirements will benefit directly from the grant project and the consortium agrees to a grant condition to that effect. An Intertribal consortium must have adequate documentation of the existence of the partnership and the authorization of the member Tribes to apply for and receive assistance.

Documentation that demonstrates the existence of the partnership of Indian Tribal governments may consist of Tribal council resolutions, Intertribal consortia resolutions in conjunction with a Tribal council resolution from each member Tribe, or other written certification from a duly authorized representative of each Tribal government that clearly demonstrates that a partnership of Indian Tribal governments exists.

Documentation that demonstrates that member Tribes authorize the consortium to apply for and receive assistance may consist of a Tribal council resolution from each Tribe or other written certification from a duly authorized representative of each Tribal government that clearly demonstrates that the Tribe authorizes the consortium to apply for and receive the grant on behalf of the Tribe.

An Intertribal consortium resolution is not adequate documentation of the member Tribes' authorization of the consortium unless it includes a written certification from a duly authorized representative of each Tribal government. Federal and state agencies, institutions of higher learning, units of local government, special purpose districts, conservation districts, watershed planning units organized pursuant to RCW 90.82.040 and 060, local management boards organized pursuant to RCW 90.88.030, salmon recovery lead entities organized pursuant to RCW 77.85.050, regional fisheries enhancement group organized pursuant to RCW 77.95.060 and nongovernmental entities are not eligible to directly receive financial assistance awards under this announcement.

Business enterprises and individuals or families will also not be eligible applicants. However, EPA strongly encourages eligible applicants to solicit participation from these types of entities as local collaborators.

All of these types of entities are eligible to apply for sub-awards or subcontracts from a successful award recipient. For certain competitive funding opportunities under this CFDA description, the Agency may limit eligibility to compete to a number or subset of eligible applicants consistent with the Agency's Assistance Agreement Competition Policy.

Beneficiary Eligibility

The beneficiary of this assistance under this program would be the Federally recognized Indian Tribes or the consortia of these Tribes that receive the assistance. Ultimate beneficiaries would include the tribal members and the general public (due to the general public's interest in restoring and protecting the resources of Puget Sound).

Credentials/Documentation

OMB Circular A-87 has been codified at 2 C.F.R. Part 225. 2 CFR 200, Subpart E - Cost Principles applies to this program.

Aplication and Award Process

Preapplication Coordination

Regarding pre-application/pre-proposal assistance with respect to competitive funding opportunities under this program description, EPA will generally specify the nature of the pre-application/pre-proposal assistance, if any, that will be available to applicants in the competitive announcement.

For additional information, contact the individual(s) listed as 'Information Contacts' or see Appendix IV of the Catalog. This program is excluded from coverage under E.O.

12372.

The State of Washington has chosen to not participate in this review process.

Environmental impact information is not required for this program.

This program is excluded from coverage under E.O.

12372.

Application Procedures

2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards applies to this program. Applicants will be required to submit application materials as described in the Request For Proposals. Applicants, except in limited circumstances approved by the Agency, must submit all initial applications for funding through http://www.grants.gov.

Award Procedures

For competitive awards, EPA will review and evaluate applications, proposals, and/or submissions in accordance with the terms, conditions, and criteria stated in the competitive announcement. Competitions will be conducted in accordance with EPA policies/regulations for competing assistance agreements. EPA reserves the right to reject all applications and make no awards under any RFP issued under this program.

Deadlines

Contact the headquarters or regional office, as appropriate, for application deadlines.

Authorization

Clean Water Act, Title III, Section 320, Public Law 94-117, 33 U.S.C 1330; Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009, Public Law 111-8; Clean Water Act, Title III, Section 320, Public Law 106-457, 33 U.S.C 1330; Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011, Public Law 111-242; Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012, Public Law 112-74; Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, Public Law 113-6; Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2014, Public Law 113-76; Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017, Public Law 114-113.

Range of Approval/Disapproval Time

The Region expects that its review of the applications received in response to competitive solicitations will be completed within 120 to 150 days following the deadline for the submission of applications for each Request for Proposals issued under this program.

Appeals

Assistance agreement competition-related disputes will be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution procedures published in 70 FR (Federal Register) 3629, 3630 (January 26, 2005). Copies of these procedures may also be requested by contacting the individual(s) listed as 'Information Contacts.' Disputes relating to matters other than the competitive selection of recipients will be resolved under 2 CFR 1500 Subpart E, as applicable.

Renewals

Not Applicable.

Assistance Considerations

Formula and Matching Requirements

This program has no statutory formula. Matching Requirements: The Puget Sound Protection and Restoration: Tribal Implementation Assistance program has no statutory formula for allocating the funds. All of the assistance agreements will be for planning and implementation projects under the Puget Sound Comprehensive Conservation Management Plan (CCMP) under CWA §320(g)(2) and §320(g)(3)(ii). There is a statutory match of 50% of the total project costs for assistance agreements under CWA §320(g)(3)(ii) and CWA Section 320 allows for an aggregate match. For the awards to be made under this program, the Puget Sound Management Conference, represented by the Puget Sound Partnership, has agreed to provide all of the required non-federal match for successful project proposals for FFY 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013,2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 under a separate cooperative agreement with EPA. Accordingly, eligible applicants will not be required to provide any of the required non-federal match. This program does not have MOE requirements.

Length and Time Phasing of Assistance

The assistance was awarded for FFY2010-2014 and in FFY2015 new grants were awarded for FFY2015-2020. Funds will be disbursed to assistance recipients in accordance with the terms specified in their respective assistance agreements, and the availability of new appropriations. A new Tribal lead organization cooperative agreement was awarded for FFY2016-2021, and incremental funds will be awarded each year depending the availability of new appropriations. See the following for information on how assistance is awarded/released: Assistance will be disbursed in accordance with the terms of each assistance agreement. Typically, assistance recipients draw funds at either monthly or quarterly intervals based on their incurred costs.

Post Assistance Requirements

Reports

No program reports are required.

No cash reports are required.

Progress report requirements will be a part of each assistance agreement.

A schedule of interim milestones and the outputs that will be completed by the end of the project period will also be included.

Progress reports will typically discuss the progress that has been made on each major task and on each interim milestone identified in the approved statement of work.

Progress reports will also discuss any difficulties or problems that have been encountered and how they have been or are being resolved.

Other specific reporting requirements will be defined in the assistance agreement based on the statement of work described in the application.

Expenditure reports will typically be required at the same time intervals as progress reports.

The expenditure reports will document expenditures to date, including expenditures of any matching funds, in a manner that allows the report user to confirm that matching requirements, if any, are being met and that all assistance payments (disbursements to assistance recipients) are for costs that have been incurred in compliance with applicable costs principles.

Recipients of this funding will be required to use EPA's Puget Sound Financial and Ecosystem Accounting Tracking System (FEATS), which is the primary mechanism for performance monitoring.

Key grant outputs will be tracked on a semi-annual basis through FEATS, as well as progress towards project milestones and deliverables.

FEATS provides linkages to EPA Puget Sound performance measures and Dashboard Indicators.

FEATS allows award recipients to share challenges, solutions, lessons learned, and reflections associated with their work.

Audits

In accordance with the provisions of 2 CFR 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements, non-Federal entities that expend financial assistance of $750,000 or more in Federal awards will have a single or a program-specific audit conducted for that year. Non-Federal entities that expend less than $750,000 a year in Federal awards are exempt from Federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in 2 CFR 200.503. Grants and cooperative agreements are subject to inspections and audits by the Comptroller General of the United States, the EPA Office of Inspector General, other EPA staff, or any authorized representative of the Federal government. Reviews by the EPA Project Officer and the Grants Specialist may occur each year. In accordance with the provisions of 2 CFR 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements, non-federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in a year in Federal awards shall have a single or a program specific audit conducted for that year. Non-federal entities that expend less than $750,000 a year in Federal awards are exempt from Federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in 2 CFR 200.503.

Records

Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting records and to substantiate charges to each grant must be kept available to personnel authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained until expiration of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report. If questions still remain, such as those raised by an audit, related records should be maintained until the matter is completely resolved.

Financial Information

Account Identification

68-0108-0-1-304.

Obigations

(Cooperative Agreements) FY 16 $4,000,000; FY 17 Not Separately Identifiable; and FY 18 est $3,700,000 - EPA has made three distinct categories of awards under this CFDA program: 1) FFY 2009 ($5M) and FFY 2010 (0.33M) funds were competitively awarded to 13 Tribes for projects to protect and restore Puget Sound. 2) FFY 2010 funds ($3M) were competitively awarded to the Lead Organization for Puget Sound recovery tribal implementation projects. An additional $5.48M in incremental funding was added to this assistance agreement in FFY 2011, $3.6M in FFY2012, $3.621M in FFY2013, $2.490M in FFY2014, and $2.490 in FFY2015. In FFY2016, a RFP was issued to select a new Lead Organization for Puget Sound recovery tribal implementation projects. $4.00M is planned to be awarded with FFY2016 funds. Funding for FFY2017 is unknown at this time. 3) FFY 2010 funds ($3.75M) were awarded to the 19 federally recognized Puget Sound Tribes and three tribal consortia to help build their capacity to engage with the Management Conference on efforts to protect and restore Puget Sound. An additional $4M in incremental funding was added to these assistance agreements in FFY 2011, $4M in FFY2012, and $3.950M in FFY2013. In FFY2014, an additional $3.950M was added to these assistance agreements. In FFY2015, new capacity agreements were approved for the 19 federally recognized Puget Sound Tribes and three tribal consortia in the amount of $3.500M. In FFY2016 incremental funding will be added to these agreements totaling $3.70M. Funding for FFY 2017 is unknown as this time.

Range and Average of Financial Assistance

EPA has made three distinct categories of awards under this CFDA program: 1) FFY 2009 ($5M) and FFY 2010 (0.33M) funds were competitively awarded to 13 Tribes for projects to protect and restore Puget Sound. 2) FFY 2010 funds ($3M) were competitively awarded to the Lead Organization for Puget Sound recovery tribal implementation projects. An additional $5.48M in incremental funding was added to this assistance agreement in FFY 2011, $3.6M in FFY2012, $3.621M in FFY2013, $2.490M in FFY2014, and $2.490 in FFY2015 In FFY2016, a RFP was issued to select a new Lead Organization for Puget Sound recovery tribal implementation projects. $4.00M was awarded with FFY2016 and FFY2017 funds for each year. Funding for FFY2018 is unknown at this time. 3) FFY 2010 funds ($3.75M) were awarded to the 19 federally recognized Puget Sound Tribes and three tribal consortia to help build their capacity to engage with the Management Conference on efforts to protect and restore Puget Sound. An additional $4M in incremental funding was added to these assistance agreements in FFY 2011, $4M in FFY2012, and $3.950M in FFY2013. In FFY2014, an additional $3.950M was added to these assistance agreements. In FFY2015, new capacity agreements were approved for the 19 federally recognized Puget Sound Tribes and three tribal consortia in the amount of $3.500M. In FFY2016 and FFY2017 incremental funding was added to these agreements totaling $3.70M each year. Funding for FFY 2018 is unknown at this time.

Regulations, Guidelines, and Literature

For grants and cooperative agreements with local governments, tribal governments and special purpose districts, the procedures and requirements should be in conformance with the OMB's Uniform Grants Guidance (UGG) located in 2 CFR 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards). This supercedes and streamlines requirements from 40 C.F.R. Part 31 'Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments', and OMB Circular Nos. A-21, A-87, A-110, and A-122 (which had been placed in 2 CFR 220, 225, 215, and 230). 40 C.F.R. Part 35 'Environmental Program Grants-State, Interstate and Local Government Agencies' is still applicable.

Information Contacts

Regional or Local Office

See Regional Agency Offices. Angela Adams, Team Lead Office of Water and Watersheds U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, OWW-193 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 553-0332 or 1-800-424-4EPA, extension 3-0332 E-Mail: adams.angela@epa.gov Angela Bonifaci, Team Leader Puget Sound Team Office of Ecosystems, Tribal and Public Affairs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, ETPA-086 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 553-0332 or 1-800-424-4EPA, extension 3-0332 E-Mail: bonifaci.angela@epa.gov.

Headquarters Office

Angela Adams Angela Adams, Team Lead Office of Water and Watersheds U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, OWW-193 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 553-0332 or 1-800-424-4EPA, extension 3-0332 E-Mail: adams.angela@epa.gov , Seattle, Washington 98101 Email: adams.angela@epa.gov Phone: (206) 553-0332

Criteria for Selecting Proposals

The evaluation and selection criteria for competitive awards under this CFDA description will be published in the announcement of the competitive funding opportunity (the Request for Proposals or RFP).



Social Entrepreneurship
Spotlight



Social Innovation Business Offers Financing Solutions to Youth


Social Innovation Business Offers Financing Solutions to Youth

A Toronto-based organization, Youth Social Innovation (YSI), has recently announced two investments that involve Growth Mosaic and MENTORnetwork. The two companies will each receive a $10,000 loan.




Human Services Jobs

  Executive Director Jobs
  Social Services Employment
  Human Services Jobs
  Social Services Jobs
  Education Jobs





More Federal Domestic Assistance Programs


Manufactured Home Loan Insurance Financing Purchase of Manufactured Homes as Principal Residences of Borrowers | Emergency Loans | Appalachian Area Development | Fellowship Program | Environmental Monitoring/Cleanup, Cultural and Resource Mgmt., Emergency Response Research, Outreach, Technical Analysis |  Site Style by YAML | Grants.gov | Grants | Grants News | Sitemap | Privacy Policy


Edited by: Michael Saunders

© 2004-2020 Copyright Michael Saunders