Fiscal Year 2016: Grants and cooperative agreements awarded to states and local governments, colleges, universities, interstate agencies and nonprofit organizations are for nonpoint source implementation, scientific research, water quality monitoring and modeling, public education and outreach, living resources management, habitat restoration and program support.
Examples are listed as follows: (1) Hypoxia: sustain and accelerate efforts to meet the LISS nutrient reduction goals in the nitrogen Total Maximum Daily Load to attain water quality conditions necessary to support the living resources of the Sound; (2) Habitat Restoration: restore and protect living resources, their habitats and ecological relationships; (3) Water Quality Monitoring: collect water quality samples at monitoring stations in Long Island Sound and interpret data on Long Island Sound and embayments.
(4) Communication/Outreach: Provide communication, outreach and education components of the LISS partnership; Research: investigate causes and effects of eutrophication on water quality and living marine resources; study factors affecting abundance and distribution of submerged aquatic vegetation, food web dynamics, and tidal wetland loss.
and living marine resources; study factors affecting abundance and distribution of submerged aquatic vegetation, food web dynamics, and tidal wetland loss.
Fiscal Year 2017: 10.904 Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention; 10.906 Watershed Surveys and Planning; 10.914 Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program; 11.419 Coastal Zone Management Administration Awards; 11.420 Coastal Zone Management Estuarine Research Reserves; 15.608 Fish and Wildlife Management Assistance; 15.611 Wildlife Restoration; 15.614 Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act; 15.615 Cooperative Endangered Species Grants and cooperative agreements awarded to states and local governments, colleges, universities, interstate agencies and nonprofit organizations are for nonpoint source implementation, scientific research, water quality monitoring and modeling, public education and outreach, living resources management, habitat restoration and program support.
Examples are listed as follows: (1) sustain and accelerate efforts to meet the LISS nutrient reduction goals in the nitrogen Total Maximum Daily Load to attain water quality conditions necessary to support the living resources of the Sound; (2) restore and protect living resources, their habitats and ecological relationships; (3) monitor water quality in Long Island Sound and interpret data on Long Island Sound and embayments.
(4) conduct communication outreach and education on Long Island Sound issues and programs; and (5) develop, calibrate, and manage the application of linked hydrodynamic-water quality-living resources models to improve nutrient management.
Fiscal Year 2018: NA.
The mission of the Environmental Protection Agency is to protect human health and the environment. Since 1970, EPA has been working for a cleaner, healthier environment for the American people.
|Recipient||Amount||Start Date||End Date|
|Research Foundation For The State University Of New York, The||$ 485,000||   ||2019-10-01||2024-09-30|
|National Fish And Wildlife Foundation||$ 2,300,000||   ||2019-10-01||2024-09-30|
|National Fish And Wildlife Foundation||$ 2,753,000||   ||2018-10-01||2023-12-20|
|Environmental Conservation, New York Department Of||$ 950,000||   ||2019-08-01||2023-09-30|
|University Of Connecticut||$ 609,326||   ||2019-10-01||2023-09-30|
|New York, City Of||$ 3,100,000||   ||2017-07-15||2022-12-31|
|National Fish And Wildlife Foundation||$ 2,321,003||   ||2017-10-01||2022-12-30|
|Research Foundation For The State University Of New York, The||$ 804,669||   ||2018-10-01||2022-09-30|
|University Of Connecticut||$ 825,958||   ||2018-10-01||2022-09-30|
|Cornell University||$ 635,202||   ||2019-01-01||2022-09-30|
Fiscal Year 2016: The 5-year rolling average for the maximum summer time area of low dissolved oxygen (hypoxia) in Long Island Sound was estimated at 138 square miles in 2016. This represents a 33.7 percent decline in the five-year rolling average compared to the pre-2000 average (i.e., before the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) was put in place by EPA and the states. This result exceeds the EPA Strategic Plan targets by 15%. The 106 New York and Connecticut wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) discharging to Long Island Sound have reduced nitrogen by more than 44,000,000 pounds annually compared to baseline levels established in the 2000 TMDL. In 2016 reported discharges were below the final TMDL targets, attaining 110% of the EPA Strategic Plan goal. In FY 16, partners restored or protected 532 acres of coastal habitat compared to the target of 96 acres in the Strategic Plan. The partners reopened 50 river miles to fish passage compared to the target of 70 miles in the Strategic Plan. Fiscal Year 2017: EPA grantees for the Long Island Sound Futures Fund grant program and the Long Island Sound Scientific Research grant program hold competitions throughout the year based on available funds and Long Island Sound Study priorities. The number of applications and the number of awards made is dependent on the announcement issued. The announcement includes the number of anticipated awards. Fiscal Year 2018: No Current Data Available
Uses and Use Restrictions
Funds may be used to implement elements of the LISS CCMP.
Special emphasis shall be given to CCMP implementation projects, research and planning, enforcement, and citizen involvement and education projects.
The Administrator may give priority to a distressed community as defined in 33 USC 1269(e)(1).
Assistance agreement awards under this program may involve or relate to geospatial information.
Further information regarding geospatial information may be obtained by viewing the following website: http://geodata.epa.gov.
Grant recipients and sub-recipients are encouraged to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving company-owned or -rented vehicles or government-owned vehicles, or while driving privately-owned vehicles when on official government business or when performing any work for or on behalf of the government.
Grant recipients and sub-recipients are encouraged to conduct initiatives of the type described in section 3(a) of the Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving Executive Order that was signed on October 1, 2009.
Generally this program makes Federal awards on a discretionary basis.
For further information, please contact the Headquarters or regional office.
State, interstate, and regional water pollution control agencies, and other public and nonprofit private agencies, institutions, and organizations held to be eligible for grants pursuant to the authorizing legislation.
State, interstate, and regional water pollution control agencies, and other public or nonprofit private agencies, institutions, and organizations are eligible.
Private profit-making entities, and individuals, are not eligible.
For certain competitive funding opportunities under this CFDA description, the Agency may limit eligibility to compete to a number or subset of eligible applicants consistent with the Agency's Assistance Agreement Competition Policy.
Assistance under this program generally benefits state, interstate, and regional water pollution control agencies and other public or nonprofit private agencies, institutions, and organizations. The general public and Long Island Sound user groups such as swimmers, beach goers, sport and commercial fishermen, boaters, and shellfishes, benefit from the results of the program through cleaner water, restored and protected habitat, and preserved and enhanced ecosystems.
Nonprofit private agencies, institutions and organizations may be required to provide documentation of their organizational status upon application. 2 CFR 200, Subpart E - Cost Principles applies to this program.
Aplication and Award Process
The EPA LISO annually provides guidance in September/October to the LISS Management Conference on developing proposals.
The LISO coordinates review of proposals to ensure consistency with program goals and objectives as outlined in the CCMP and develops funding recommendations for the LISS Management Committee's consideration in early winter.
The Management Committee makes final recommendations on funding at that time, or as otherwise specified.
Successful applicants are required to submit formal grant applications using the standard federal grant application forms.
The EPA Long Island Sound Office (LISO) issues annual guidance on the form and content of pre-proposals.
All pre-proposals or work statements should be consistent with LISO's guidance.
Consultation or technical assistance may be available upon request from the LISO to aid applicants in preparing their pre-proposal.
Regarding pre-application/pre-proposal assistance with respect to competitive funding opportunities under this program description, EPA will generally specify the nature of the pre-application/pre-proposal assistance, if any, that will be available to applicants in the competitive announcement.
For additional information, contact the individual(s) listed as 'Information Contacts' or see Regional contacts in the Catalog.
An environmental impact statement or environmental impact assessment is not required for this program.
Environmental impact information is not required for this program.
This program is eligible for coverage under E.O.
12372, 'Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs.' An applicant should consult the office or official designated as the single point of contact in his or her State for more information on the process the State requires to be followed in applying for assistance, if the State has selected the program for review.
2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards applies to this program. The EPA LISO annually releases a request for base program pre-proposals in the Fall. Preproposals are due to the LISO generally by early January or as specified in guidance. The LISS management committee reviews pre-proposals in late January to identify areas of concern and to request additional information or clarification on proposals through the LISO. The LISO coordinates review of pre-proposals among the several LISS technical work groups and teams to ensure consistency with program goals and objectives as outlined in the CCMP and other priorities as directed by the management committee. If necessary, applicants are contacted by the LISO to provide the additional information or clarification. The LISO coordinates review of the revised proposals and develops funding recommendations for the management committee's consideration in April. The management committee makes final recommendations on funding preproposals at that time, or as otherwise specified. Applicants are advised of the status of their request by the LISO within 30 days of the management committee's final decisions. Successful applicants are required to submit formal grant applications using the standard federal grant application forms. The deadline for submitting applications may vary by EPA Region, but is generally June 1. Applications not received by the deadline are not further considered for funding. Unallocated funds are carried over or otherwise used to further the purposes of this program at the discretion of the management committee. Applicants, except in limited circumstances approved by the Agency, must submit all initial applications for funding through http://www.grants.gov. .
Each federal assistance application and final work plan will be evaluated by the LISO to determine the adequacy of the application under LISS priorities and objectives, including technical merit and relevance of the project to the implementation of the CCMP and for consistency with the pre-application proposal. Each federal assistance award application will also be subject to an administrative review by the EPA Region 1 or 2 grants management office as 8/17/2017 CFDA https://usepa-7291dac51b2874.sharepoint.com/sites/OARM/CFDA/CFDA-SPAddin/index.html#/program/26/print 8/16 appropriate. Funds are awarded by the EPA Region 1 or 2 Administrator as appropriate. Grantees will receive a final assistance award package from the appropriate EPA Regional grants management office. An assistance agreement recipient demonstrates its commitment to carry out the award by either: 1) drawing down funds within 21 days after the EPA award or amendment mailing date; or, 2) not filing a notice of disagreement with the award terms and conditions within 21 days after the EPA award or amendment mailing date. Recipients are not required to sign and return a copy of the award document. Payments under awards may be made on an advance or reimbursement basis. For competitive awards, EPA will review and evaluate applications, proposals, and/or submissions in accordance with the terms, conditions, and criteria stated in the competitive announcement. Competitions will be conducted in accordance with EPA policies/ regulations for competing assistance agreements.
Contact the headquarters or regional office, as appropriate, for application deadlines.
Clean Water Act, Section 119(d).
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time
Notification of action on pre-proposals is provided approximately 120 days after the deadline for pre-proposal submission. Final grantees are notified of approval approximately 90 days after the submission of the application for federal assistance.
Assistance agreement competition-related disputes will be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution procedures published in 70 FR (Federal Register) 3629, 3630 (January 26, 2005). Copies of these procedures may also be requested by contacting the individual(s) listed as 'Information Contacts.' Disputes relating to matters other than the competitive selection of recipients will be resolved under 2 CFR 1500 Subpart E, as applicable.
Renewals are subject to approval of EPA.
Formula and Matching Requirements
This program has no statutory formula. Matching Requirements: This program has no statutory formula (33 USC 1269(d)(3)). Federal costs for citizen involvement and education grants shall not exceed 95 percent of the costs of such work; for all other grants and cooperative agreements, federal costs shall not exceed 50 percent of the research, studies, or work. EPA has determined that annual matching requirements for LISS grant awards shall be met in the aggregate for all funds awarded as specified in the approved annual work plan. This program does not have MOE requirements.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance
Assistance agreements are generally made for a one-year period corresponding to the federal fiscal year, October-September. Awards may be made for longer periods upon justification and with the approval of EPA. Awards may be made by advance or reimbursement at the discretion of EPA. See the following for information on how assistance is awarded/released: The method of fund disbursement will be determined at the time of award.
Post Assistance Requirements
EPA includes reporting requirements for grants and cooperative agreements in the terms and conditions of the agreements.
Agreements require semi-annual and final progress reports, and expenditure/financial, equipment, and invention reports.
Specific reporting requirements are also identified in the grant regulations at 2 CFR 200 and 1500, as applicable.
Program reports are required under this program.
See Section 113, Records for post assistance requirements.
Cash reports are required under this program.
Progress reports are required under this program.
Expenditure reports are required under this program.
Performance monitoring is required under this program.
In accordance with the provisions of 2 CFR 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements, non-Federal entities that expend financial assistance of $750,000 or more in Federal awards will have a single or a program-specific audit conducted for that year. Non-Federal entities that expend less than $750,000 a year in Federal awards are exempt from Federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in 2 CFR 200.503. Grants and cooperative agreements are subject to inspections and audits by the Comptroller General of the United States, the EPA Office of Inspector General, other EPA staff, or any authorized representative of the Federal government. Reviews by the EPA Project Officer and the Grants Specialist may occur each year.
Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting records and to substantiate changes to each grant, must be kept available to personnel authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained for three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report. If questions still remain, such as those raised as a result of audit, related records should be retained until the matter is completely resolved.
(Project Grants) FY 16 $3,893,000; FY 17 est $80,000,000; and FY 18 Estimate Not Available(Exp: Not in budget) - FY 16 $3,893,000; and FY 17 est. $8,000,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance
Range: $20,000 to $2,000,000/fiscal year; Average: $438,611/fiscal year.
Regulations, Guidelines, and Literature
LISS grants and cooperative agreements are subject to grant regulations at 40 CFR Part 35, 2 CFR 200 and 1500; annual EPA Office of Water National Estuaries Program guidance; the LISS CCMP, and Long Island Sound 2003 or successor Agreement.
Regional or Local Office
See Regional Agency Offices. Mark Tedesco, USEPA Long Island Sound Office, Government Center, 888 Washington Boulevard, Suite 9-11, Stamford, Connecticut 06904; Telephone: (203) 977-1541; FAX: (203) 977-1546; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
surabhi shah USEPA Office of Water; Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds,Oceans, Wetlands & Communities Division 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460. Contact: Surabhi Shah, Telephone: (202) 564-1383; FAX: (202) 566-1336; E-mail: email@example.com , Washington, District of Columbia 20460 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Phone: 202-564-1383 Fax: 202-566-1338
Criteria for Selecting Proposals
The evaluation and selection criteria for competitive awards under this CFDA description will be Hypoxia, toxic substances, pathogen contamination, dissolved oxygen, habitat restoration, public participation, water quality, estuary, embayments, monitoring, nutrients, sediment, nonpoint sources, TMDL, nitrogen, living resources, wetlands, eutrophication, food webs, submerged aquatic vegetation, Long Island Sound, LISS, abundance, distribution, models, modeling, hydrodynamic, public education. described in the competitive announcement.
Crowd-sourcing is deemed an effective and useful tool to preserve and protect the earth’s species. As proof, the International Barcode of Life (iBOL) summons citizens around the world to collect samples to assist universities, natural history museums and research institutes.
Unable to select database